OTTAWA, Oct. 1: Canada is confronting what business leaders describe as an investment crisis as the federal government prepares its next budget, with calls mounting for tax relief, tariff support, and improved access to capital. In a formal budget submission to Prime Minister Mark Carney, the Business Council of Canada said that while strategic investments are necessary, Ottawa cannot finance them by saddling future generations with unsustainable debt.

The council’s president and CEO, Goldy Hyder, urged that the deficit for this year be halved within three years, and that no new permanent programs should be launched without matching savings or identified revenue sources. The council expressed concern over a proposed reclassification of spending into “capital” versus “operating” categories, warning it could enable conversion of routine outlays into purported investments.
The council’s remarks come amid growing pressure on the government. Nearly 1,000 briefs have been submitted to the House of Commons finance committee ahead of the Nov. 4 budget, spanning sectors from health to technology. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has forecast that Ottawa’s deficit could reach C$68.5 billion this year, up sharply from C$51.7 billion the year before. Business organizations across the country have aligned behind several core proposals.
Ottawa urged to prioritize capital access and tax reform
Many executives and policy experts contend that Canada’s fiscal challenge is not a shortage of revenue but unbounded spending, and that any revenue increase should come via the Goods and Services Tax (GST), which is seen as the least distortionary option. In the Business Council’s “What We Heard” report, it was noted that groups overwhelmingly agreed on the GST route if additional revenue is required. Tariff relief is another high-priority demand. Companies affected by U.S. import duties are pressing Ottawa to act more aggressively to shield domestic industry.
Some proposals call for expanded tariff mitigation, streamlined relief programs, or enhanced financing tools to counteract trade headwinds. Smaller businesses and regional firms are advocating for tax relief with broad reach, rather than narrowly targeted subsidies. The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) argues that reducing tax burden overall would better support growth than new sector-specific initiatives. Innovation-focused groups have also weighed in.
Trade disruptions amplify calls for federal tariff support
The Council of Canadian Innovators has criticized the current SR&ED (Scientific Research and Experimental Development) tax credit regime as too complex and said it disproportionately benefits large multinationals. The group is calling for reform to make the incentive more accessible to startups and domestic technology firms. Meanwhile, the government has already advanced some tariff support mechanisms.
In early September, Prime Minister Carney unveiled the Regional Tariff Response Initiative, along with a suite of programs including a tariff loan facility and a strategic response fund, aimed at helping firms cope with external pressures. As Ottawa digests the wide-ranging submissions, the upcoming budget will be watched for how it reconciles the competing demands of fiscal restraint and economic stimulus. Business groups say clear rules, disciplined trade‑offs, and avoidance of hidden spending reclassifications are essential for restoring investor confidence. – By Content Syndication Services.
